A Stock Market Game for Students May Teach the Wrong Lessons; 5 Reasons Why (& Better Alternatives)
- Patricia Saylor
- Nov 1, 2022
- 4 min read
Updated: 2 days ago

Many stock market games designed for students are an exercise in gambling, not Investing.
Many student stock market games teach kids to gamble, not invest. Here are five reasons these short-term simulations send the wrong message — and better ways to help teens learn real investing skills that build long-term wealth.
When My Son’s Middle School Stock Market Game Missed the Mark
When my son was in middle school, his class completed a stock-market simulation. The students were divided into teams, given a lump sum of virtual cash, and told to compete for the highest gains.
The “game” lasted just three weeks.
His team did fine, and they learned how to pick and buy stocks — but the experience taught all the wrong lessons about how investing really works.
The teacher’s intentions were good. Understanding the stock market is a key part of financial literacy, especially for students whose families may not have access to generational investing knowledge. But the structure of the assignment itself — short timeline, large lump sum, and unrealistic goals — made the whole exercise more like gambling than investing.
1. Short-Term Trading Teaches the Wrong Lessons
Keeping a position open for only a few days or weeks is speculation, not investing.
In a four-week window, no one can analyze trends, manage risk, or plan an entry and exit strategy. The “winners” of the game often win because of luck, not skill.
As I told a student recently on Reddit: a 4-week investing game with a $100,000 lump sum teaches exactly what not to do. A real investor wouldn’t pour all their money into the market at once and expect meaningful results in a month.
2. No Time to Benefit from Dividends
Dividends are a major part of long-term wealth building — but most dividends are paid quarterly.
That means a student with a three- or four-week trading window will likely miss both the ex-dividend date and the payout date, even if they choose strong dividend-paying stocks. The simulation encourages chasing fast gains instead of patiently earning income through dividends and reinvestment.
3. Lump-Sum Investing Is Unrealistic
Giving students $100,000 in virtual cash and telling them to spend it immediately sends the wrong signal.
Most real investors start small and build their portfolios gradually. A more authentic simulation would give each participant a modest starting balance and add small, regular contributions each week or month — mirroring how real people invest through paychecks and retirement accounts.
This approach naturally introduces dollar-cost averaging, one of the most powerful and sustainable long-term investing strategies.
4. Students Don’t Learn to Use Limit or Stop Orders
In real life, investors can’t (and shouldn’t) watch their screens all day. Learning to use limit orders and trailing stop orders helps protect against volatility and automate buying and selling decisions.
Most classroom games ignore these essential tools, leaving students with the impression that trading is all about guessing the right time to click “buy” or “sell.”
5. They Miss the Opportunity to Learn About Options
Once a student understands how stock ownership works, they can safely explore beginner-friendly options strategies — especially cash-secured puts and covered calls.
Used properly, these can generate income and lower the cost basis on high-quality investments.
For instance, a student could sell a cash-secured put on a strong ETF or blue-chip stock, earn premium income upfront, and potentially buy shares at a discount if assigned. If that happens, they can then sell another put at a lower strike price — gradually laddering into ownership while cushioning volatility.
This kind of realistic, strategic learning is far more valuable than a one-month sprint to chase paper profits.
Better Ways to Teach Real Investing
Here’s how teachers and parents can turn an unrealistic game into a lasting learning experience:
Lengthen the timeline. A six-month to one-year challenge lets students see how markets rise and fall over time.
Use ongoing contributions. Add virtual “income” each week to mimic real-world investing habits.
Incorporate dividends and reinvestment. Teach the concept of compounding.
Practice with realistic orders. Show how to set limit and stop orders.
Introduce safe options concepts. Only after mastering stock ownership.
If you’re a parent, you can even set up a paper trading account through your brokerage platform — ThinkorSwim’s paperMoney accounts are excellent — and guide your teen through a slower, more realistic investing journey.
A Personal Note
After my son’s three-week stock market game ended, we opened a real investment account with $1,000 he had saved. He was twelve years old. Together, we learned to choose diversified funds, reinvest dividends, and watch the account grow.
That experience — not the classroom game — taught him patience, discipline, and confidence.
Ready to Help Your Teen Learn Real Investing Skills?
If your teen is curious about investing, there are two great next steps:
Schedule a parent-teen coaching session with me through Saylor Financial Fundamentals. We’ll meet online, explore how investing really works, and set your teen on a safe, informed path.
Watch my free YouTube series, Starting from Scratch: A Novice Investor’s Guide to Investing in the Stock Market — designed to help beginners of any age learn step by step, without hype or gimmicks.
Investing isn’t about winning a short-term game. It’s about understanding the system, managing risk, and building a lifetime of financial confidence.






Comments